BRAC Reviews (1972-2004)
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10361/13071
Browse
Recent Submissions
listelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC RDP/RCP: annual financial review mission(© BRAC, 1996-12-19) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC Rural Development Programme (RDP) IV: mid-term review(© BRAC, 1999-08) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , Annual review on credit and financial issues: RDP and RCP(© BRAC, 1994-10) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , listelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC procedures review, 1997(© BRAC, 1997-10) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC procedures review, 1996(© BRAC, 1996-12-31) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC review mission, 1994: internal management review and local and national level coordination(© BRAC, 1993-11) BRACThe 1994 BRAC review mission takes place in the context of the continued rapid expansion of BRAC programmes and staffing. BRAC's expansion has been enumerated in terms of AOs and VOs. Group Members and credit disbursed. It has not been visualized geographically, except for the recent district-level map or BRAC activities. Mapping expansion is a tool by which BRAC can examine its spatial expansion in relation to gaps an coverage, and in relation to interactions with GOB and other NGOs.listelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC wide management and training review(© BRAC, 1992-07) BRAClistelement.badge.dso-type Item , BRAC annual review, 1990(© BRAC, 1990-11) BRACThis report comments on performance to physical targets and performance to financial budgets during the first nine months of 1990. Inevitably, there are variations, but we did not identify any which we judge need be of major concern to donors. The general record is of greater rather than lesser achievement in relation to what was planned. The report focuses on those areas where we believe improvements might be made. In many cases, our suggestions are largely endorsements of what we have discovered BRAC is already doing, or of changes that BRAC has already started to make. In certain areas, we have identified further improvements. In only a few instances do we recommend changes of substance or significance.